Here's Cameron's speech on the NHS
http://bit.ly/kMN76F He says: "We’re getting better, and in some cases we’re closing the gap with our European neighbours, but we’ve still got some way to go. If we had cancer survival rates at the average in Europe, we’d save 5,000 lives a year."
As I pointed out on the 15th April, a month ago, this figure is from TEN YEARS AGO. It is not evidence that we're still getting better, and it tells us nothing about how far we have to go. Wheeling out this figure again is staggering. This is the behaviour of people who don't care whether their figures are accurate, current, or relevant.
http://bit.ly/dIDUzS
Then the trouble starts. In large letters, alone on one entire page, you see: “If the NHS was performing at truly world-class levels we would save an extra 5,000 lives from cancer every year.” The reference for this is a paper in the British Journal of Cancer called “What if cancer survival in Britain were the same as in Europe: how many deaths are avoidable?”
This study does not aim to predict the future: in fact, it looks at data from 1985 to 1999 (seriously) which is a very long time ago. It finds that if we’d had the mean EU cancer survival rates, in the 80s and 90s, then we’d have had 7,000 fewer deaths then. Not 5,000 fewer. And to put the big number in context, by this study’s calculation, that means 6-7% of UK cancer deaths were avoidable in the 1990s. Since then, we’ve seen the massive 2000 NHS Cancer Plan, a new decade, and a new century. This paper says nothing about the number of lives we “would save” each year in 2011, and citing it in that context is bizarre.