Here's an amusingly hidden-away correction from the Mail that went up on Friday.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/ushome/article-1388708/Dr-Austin.html
Statements contained in an article published on 7 March, headed “Babies who are born at 23 weeks should be left to die, says NHS chief”, were wrongly attributed to Dr Daphne Austin, who is a medical consultant specialist employed by the NHS.
They were made in a programme in which Dr Austin participated and were published by us in good faith. In particular, Dr Austin did not state that babies should be “left to die” and did not express the opinion that the financial aspects of neonatal care were the issue. We apologise to Dr Austin for the errors.
As I've written a zillion times before, clear corrections for honest (or even dishonest) mistakes are a good thing, and they make me trust a person/institution more rather than less, especially when freely given.
Since they're often hard to find, I wondered if someone had thought about setting up a database or blog of corrections? Stop me if it's already been done (or rather, link me) but I think it might be useful, if not as a database to inform people, at least as a tool for gathering them all in one place, and triggering some conversations and thoughts about them.
In the world of academia you might enjoy:
http://retractionwatch.wordpress.com/And in case you missed it, here's is the ubercorrection:
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/hygiene/home/article190130.ece
IN an article published on The Sun website on January 27 under the headline ?Gollum joker killed in live rail horror’ we incorrectly stated that Julian Brooker, 23, of Brighton, was blown 15ft into the air after accidentally touching a live railway line.
His parents have asked us to make clear he was not turned into a fireball, was not obsessed with the number 23 and didn’t go drinking on that date every month.
Julian’s mother did not say, during or after the inquest, her son often got on all fours creeping around their house pretending to be Gollum.
Also, quotes from a witness should have been attributed to Gemma Costin not Eva Natasha. We apologise for the distress this has caused Julian’s family and friends.
Update:
I'm a bit of a dumbass for forgetting this site, which I've visited before:
http://www.regrettheerror.com/
though it's generally jsut the funnier ones.
In my fantasy world, we'd have a set of community-sourced factual corrections and background material on a structured database of news stories, but that wld take a few million quid more than we have at our disposal.